 Me and my Dad One has to question why this new system, the last system and the one before that are all designed to hit every father as if he were a "non resident parent" that did absolutely nothing for his kids, who neither seen, cared for nor wanted to contribute or be a part of their children's lives? While any NRP that does try to be actively involved with his children and that is by far the majority of fathers is penalised, victimised and left in a position where he may be incapable of being financially involved with his kids in favour of his ex partner who can be in a situation where they bear no financial responsibilities what so ever. Why do all three of these systems drive a huge wedge between mother and father?
Why must payment revolve around the child benefit book ?. Shouldn't it revolve around the child? Is it simply to simplify the situation for the government administration agencies, to force a black and white situation, to set mother against father, to incite access denial, to reduce the possibilities of shared parenting? This government keep preaching that they really do care and understand - but they very obviously niether care nor undrestand the basics of shared parenting. How can any system fail to take into account the needs of the father both emotionaly, in that he should have a right to access and be involved in the bring up of his son, he should have as much right as the mother to inclusion into the finance equasion of looking after their children. This government frequently denies any reduction in csa payments for a fathers cost while he has responsability for his children, not for food, clothing, transport, entertainment or anything else, infact should dad have the kids for the entire school hollidays not only will he not be allowed any reduction for his increased costs but he must continue to pay CSA every week! This is insane, it's a form of robbery and it is not in the interests of any children. However the ex partners benefit, they still recieve the same payments but don't have the children and in some cases the government benefits pocketing the difference between collected income and benefit payments, both at the expense of the non resident parent and his children! This is a fundemental flaw that must be corrected. Fathers everywhere will fail to comply with such shamefull laws. We demand equal parenting. We demand you change these wrongs and set them right. Are we to believe our MP's and the CSA are not aware of these wrongs? If so csa should be closed and we need a new government! In many cases the government pockets the difference between what it collects and what it pays out, at the same time claiming publicly that it's fighting child poverty. How long can we bare these terrible lies? CSA have shown that they will jail loving fathers that care for their children and share this responsibility evenly with their ex partner. How can we the people tolerate MP's that sanction such insanity? Especially while in the very same week criminals are being released early to make room in the jails (for loving fathers). A system where the courts will remove driving licences from loving fathers preventing them travelling to see their kids, transporting their kids or even earning a living to contribute to their kids (and many do outside of csa demands). Things must change and the steel fist of the new CSA 3 renamed C-MEC is not fit for this purpose and is doomed to fail as dismally as its predecessors, possibly even more so. No more will we tolerate the suicide of fathers because of pressure from this agency or the after effects of its vultures the bailiffs. Loving Fathers must react, We've lived through 14 years of this torture. Is the answer to remove these politicians from office? Is the answer to fight CSA with name and shame? by demonstration? by non compliance or by civil disobedience or do we need to go further? How do we, the countries loving fathers, tell our government that we are no longer going to stand being abused and used as a money machine for rancid government agencies and funding the lives of ex partners? and where access is being denied funding must inevitably be denied and this stance should be supported by the state. Why should men be forced into emigration and forced to forget loved children because an ex partner bears them malice and wishes to abuse and use the children as a weapon? Why does the government not name and shame these awful women? We demand to be involved, we demand equality, we demand access, we demand real equal even handed justice.  When I was a boy of fourteen, my father was so ignorant I could hardly stand to have the old man around. But when I got to be twenty-one, I was astonished at how much the old man had learned in seven years. Last update:
Users' Comments (0)  |
|
|