| It's only a TV licence |
|
Both Tony Blair and Gordon Brown have claimed the cost of their TV licences in their MP’s expenses. No doubt a fully legal expense claim and without question the tax payer stumped up the hundred and sixteen pounds to cover the cost. According to wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prime_Minister_of_the_United_Kingdom The Prime Minister draws his or her salary not as Prime Minister, but as First Lord of the Treasury. At present, he or she receives £127,334 and that’s plus expenses. But still these two had to get the hard pressed taxpayer to stump up for their TV license! according to the BBC Gordon was Chancellor of the Exchequer, the man that decides just about everything about the penny in your pocket and now Gordon wants to sanction a brand new plan to allow the tax payer the privilege of holding all the debt for the countries failed banking endeavours based largely on surprise, the American bailout system. Of course at the same time the poorest in our society are to have their 10% tax band removed causing untold financial misery, hmmm where is the phasein in this little deal? Oh! phasing only applies to CSA and only when dads payments should really drop dramatically but with phasing CSA can make him pay more for longer! This is the same Gordon that wasn’t voted into office, the one that took over from Tony Blair, that's the guy that not only got the tax payer to buy his TV license but was at the root of the scandal whereby it was alleged (cash for honours) that his pal Lord Levi was attempting or may even have “sold” peerages, that’s the right to vote in the house of lords, yes the same Tony Blair that kowtowed to the Saudi prince that was getting a back hander of, wait for it a Billion quid to ok a “British” arms deal by quashing an enquiry into the bribery and corruption. Are we to believe Mr. Browns Hands were not steeped in this FILTH? These are the same two men that ran the government when the CSA was deemed to be “unfit for purpose” the actual words by Mr. Blair I believe. Since then the CSA have moved on taking a record 25 million pounds plus from the tax payer in bonuses paid to staff for “achieving set targets” over a 5 year period http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/6347955.stm Daily we get reports and complaints about the operation of this vile agency and as you might expect the picture it paints is about as clean as the hands of the bloody war mongering Tony Blair and the bumbling economist Brown who it seems likes watching American TV. It seems the British taxpayer has bottomless pockets and besides paying for wars in far off parts of the world to please their American pals. Blair and Brown can also not only ask the tax payer to pay for their TV licenses but a thousand a week to jail fathers, in some cases loving, supporting fathers for failing to pay the CSA. The CSA of course hand over much of the money they collect to the treasury, last year just short of 100 million pounds.
It’s also easy to see too why we have court cases where the judge is prohibited from hearing all the evidence as in the case when anyone mentions money in a CSA show trial! The government aren't above crushing justice out of the system, we now not only have proof of that, we have it documented. So what’s a couple of TV licenses compared to that? This the same Gordon that bleats on about child poverty while his government continue stealing child tax credits from families daily. The same Gordon bleating on about Mugabi not being voted into office, excuse us but were you Mr. Brown? and when you were given the opportunity, did you call the election? Oh and we are not party political, in the case of Cameron, that fool cannot be trusted with a bike so why would anyone trust him with the country? (click the arrow for more and video link) in all seriousnes how can this fool Cameron believe we would have him in charge of our country, the man has no respect for the law of the road at all, so why should you or I or the crimminals respect any laws, he obviously is going to do exactly as he pleases law or no law. Watch this utter clown in action http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=egsSsPrkZiQ What's really funny about Brown claiming the cost of his TV license on his expenses is that this is the man that vetoed the 10p in the pound tax rate for the poor, robbing the poor of untold millions that will ultimatly go into government coffers yet these same taxpayers have to pay the expenses of their MP's, including MPs claims for tv licences (how many others?) I think we all agree that reasonable expenses should be met by the tax payer but your TV license? and for that matter any expenses relating to second homes, taxis for wives to go shopping, fitted kitchens, and the bloody television itself, never mind the 250 quid, ask no questions no reciept required. If you've got an opinion on this don't hesitate to let us know what you think. Last update:
|
No comment posted |