Choose your screen resolution: Auto adjust 800x600 1024x768

Newsflash

The Data Protection Officer
Child Support Agency
Room BP6002
Benton Park View
Newcastle Upon Tyne
NE98 1YX

They have 40 days, from the day they receive the request, to comply, test them.
 
A blog of all section with no images
You can't win using their law - so don't use it! PDF Print E-mail

It's a scam, you knew it was.  We now comnfirm that it's a scam to take your money for the government, not for your kids.

Click on the audio and listen to Maurice and Sherry.

http://www.lawfulrebellion.org/2010/01/15/dead-beat-dads-says-affidavits-work/

You have to wake up, It's never nice waking up but you must wake up, you must become aware of what's going on.

This site is now only going to redirect everyone to the resources that will assist you to wake up. We triesd to fight them using their law for 10 long years only to discover, lies and deception, scam after scam. We know know state secrets and they are shocking, you too must know these secrets

ONCE WOKEN YOU CAN DEMOLISH CSA CASES BUT YOU MUST WAKE UP!!! 
They have you wraped in a sleep blanket, a buble, an illusion. 

You don't know your sleeping, you honestly think you are awake but believe me you are sleeping.

Have you seen the Matrix? I know you think I'm crazy. The blue pill, the red pill, the rabbit hole...

Please search no further on this site go now directly to the sites below and spend a few hours reading through what like minded people are saying and you will begin a fantastic process of waking up a voyage through the vile corruption that has been going on around you all of your life as you slept blissfully unaware of what they've been doing but now you really do need to know. 

The CSA scam is the one that has forced me to wake up, ten years later, I touched the bubble from the inside and it disapeared, Other are wakening too, the secret is out, I'm well awake now and I see it all clearly, it's very, very clever and that's was so as not to awake you, but the clumsy CSA made just too much noise for just too long and finaly I wqokje up but don't take my word for it find out for yourself, just do a little research on the sites below and the route to all the answers are there.  I don't want any money at all, I don't want anything from you but I do dearly want you to wake up for all our sakes.

This info is only now starting to get through to those who have woke up, we are still only in the thousands but daily many awake, don't sleep in to-day.

Freedom Rebels

THE PEOPLES UNITED COMMUNITY

FREE MAN ON THE LAND

Scottish Sovereigns-On-The-Land

http://www.deadbeatdadsassociation.co.uk/

THEY LIE, THEY CHEAT, THEY COMMIT FRAUD, THEY ABUSE THEIR OWN RULES BUT STILL YOU CAN BEAT THEM

=======================================================

One Day in Maggie's Cabinet

...Hey, here's a good one, lets make fathers pay twice for their kids, there's got to be a millions in easy targets if we wire up the "law" for it.

OK lets pass an act of parliament, they all believe this stuff is law even although its not so we'll catch them with that saying they are the liable person. In the Act we'll preclude the Judge from looking at any evidence concerning money, yeh... that should do it. Ha ha the case is about money so that's a scream, ok finally let's make sure we tie them down for ever, either they pay us or we torture them for life with say...  lets think, Hmmm... driving bans, max two yeas every time we take the sucker to court. Hey, we could keep taking a licence of a guy all his life until he finally pays up.

ok so we use the act to say he's the liable guy but what about proof, you know the old maxim in law, liability without proof is no liability at all. Oh that's all right well use the act as the proof as well, he a father for christ sake so he liable if he's liable and he's a father and we say he has to pay then the Judge will just do him over and he'll pay or else we'll torture him forever...

 =====================================================

Are you aware that the court get paisd a fee for every liability case they "resolve" currently believed to be 8% of the take!

=====================================================

Question is C-MEC an Authority or is it just a company like any other company?

Watch John Harrises "Its an illusion"
http://www.bbc5.tv/eyeplayer/video/john-harris-its-illusion


Last update:

Published in : , Information
Editor's review User comments Quote this article in website Favoured Print Send to friend Save this to del.icio.us Related articles Read more...
 
It's Time to call it quits PDF Print E-mail

C-MEC and CSA, time to shut these companies down.
 
When the government becomes this corupt it becomes the duty of freemen and women to resist. A form of peacfull lawful rebelion becomes a duty.
To ensure the populous have the information to do that education from those who "know" to those who don't becomes an obligation.

So where do we start?

Well the education comes first, your education!

Let’s start with the LAW. Do you know anything about the LAW?

You need to learn a little about the law and we are going to give you that very important knowledge. We are going tell you what you need to know to defeat this company, this corporation, yes you read that correctly C-MEC and CSA are companies they are NOT the LAW and they can be held at bay. You need to learn how to deal with these companies. We will show you the way, we will light the path, we will guide you and we and our fellow friends at other sites will even hold your hand to ensure you do not stray from the path but you my friend must walk the path yourself to be free of these leeches that suck your pockets to fill the treasury coffers.

"How?" I hear you say?

Let’s get started

There are essentially two aspects of law, lawful and legal do you know the difference?

These leeching companies, the legal profession, judges, courts, lawyers and the like would like you to believe that they are the same, that lawful is legal and legal is lawful but nothing could be further from the truth. They are at opposite ends of the spectrum.

This legal, lawful puzzle has to be fully and completely understood by all who wish to free themselves from CSA/C-MEC slavery. This is at the heart of their awfull deception and as we progress the legal/lawful fog will clear from you mind and with new sharp comprehension of reality you will know how to defeat these companies for that is all that they are, companies specialising in removing money from you. They have absolutely nothing what so ever to do with children or child poverty, they are simply businesses set up by a corrupt government to funnel large volumes of cash into the treasury machine.

Let’s start with lawful. Lawful is very simple, it goes back further than the bible, lawful is the basic rules that allow humans to live together in peace as a rough rule of thumb, don’t Kill, don’t steal, don’t commit fraud and don’t breach the peace. That’s it in a nutshell, that’s THE LAW. That is the law of the land and if you break that law the people have the lawful right to arrest you, have a trial by jury and if you’re found guilty pass a sentence on you. That’s the LAW, Often referred to as The Common Law, the LAW of the Land, the Queens law. This LAW is both lawful and legal and the people who administer this law are under a sworn Oath to uphold the LAW.

Well I hear you say, “That’s nothing new, I knew that was the Law”

Well what about the Child support Act 1991? Is that Law?

C-MEC and CSA staff will tell you that’s the law, they take you into a court and ask a judge, magistrate, sheriff to grant a liability order, and he will, in this corrupt government system, he has no options. Is that LAW?

Let’s look at the word LEGAL
To administer the LAW, The Common Law, the law of the land the monarchs of old created judges and later, much later the government made all the judges, magistrates and sheriffs as somebody who knew the Law had to deal with transgressions of those laws and here we are talking about the common law. Those judges, magistrate, sheriffs, lawyers, QC’S etc formed the Law Society, a club with its own rules even its own language, these were clever fellows so for their language they didn’t invent new words, they just changed the meaning of existing words and yes any society can legaly invent its own language and legally do as they have done change the meaning of words. For example what do you think the word “person” means?

Yes, in everyday common language it refers to a human, a man a woman, someone but in the legal world the world of the Law Society it means a “persona” a legal entity, it’s not a reference to a human being at all, it’s a reference to a fictional entity, a reference to something that was created, not born of woman. Let’s move on just a little, the abreviation MR what does that mean exactly? I hear you say “it’s just a title like Sir” I’m afraid not. It too is a reference to the legal entity, the fictional character sometimes referred to as the strawman.

So if they force you into a court by sending you a legal document called a summons with your name printed on it all in Capital letters and lets say you arrive late and enter the court, the judge is on the bench, the case is called and you stand up and the judge asks you to step forward and you do and he then he asks you if you are the person called MR JOE BLOGGS and you say “Yes your honour”

What have you just done?

I hear you say “Nothing but agreed that was my name?”

Well in a court you have moved from the LAWFUL jurisdiction to the LEGAL jurisdiction and there is a world of a difference as you will see.

You are human, your made of flesh and blood and you are called Joe of the family of Bloggs but you also have a strawman, made not out of flesh and blood but a legal entity, a created fictional character, he’s like a little counter, something like the top hat or the racing car when you’re playing monopoly, you play the game but you move the counter around the board. He has a name too, it’s the same as your name but it’s ALWAYS WRITTEN IN CAPITALS AND IT ALWAYS HAS MR. MRS. OR MISS OR MS in front of it, before computers his name was BLOGS JOE, do you remember him now, he is your Fiction and he is the guy that deals with all your legal paperwork he’s the guy they sent the summons to, not you but they can’t get money out of a legal fiction so they have rules about getting control of you the human in their legal but not nessesary lawfull court, not a lawful court because this court is not going deal with the common law, killing or theft or fraud or even a breach of the peace, no this is a business court and it’s all about money so much so that the Oath is not in this court, It’s what we call a de facto court, it deals with facts, there is no jury only an arbitrator ajudge of somesort and that’s the guy on the bench and for him to arbitrate in your case he needs your consent but you don’t know that, you think it’s all just LAW when in fact there is no law in this court at all as we have defined common law, it’s a legal court but not nessesarily a lawful court and to get jurisdiction over you all the judge has to do is get you to do as you are told, much like the captain of a ship if he gives you an order and you follow it then you acknowledge that he’s in charge so when he asks you to step forward and you do you just moved from having lawful rights to having legal rights and there is a world of a difference. Then you agreed that MR JOE BLOGGS was your name and that joined you the human to the legal fiction, the strawman, it gave the judge what known as joinder so now whatever the judge decides happens to the strawman happens to you no matter whether that is money to be paid or a time in jail You've been conned!

In conclusion there are two types of law, common law and statute law. Common law is the real law. Statutory Acts are rules passed by government that are only given the force of law by the consent of the governed. Which means that they are not law at all unless you either wittingly or unwittingly consent to them being law.

So how does that help us with the CSA and CMEC. These are just commercial companies that use these acts to squeeze cash out of you.
At this point we want you to go and have a look at a few other websites all intimately concerned about the behavior of companies like CSA/C-MEC

http://www.csa-must-go.co.uk/

http://www.deadbeatdadsassociation.co.uk/

http://www.tpuc.org/

http://www.fmotl.com/

http://www.freedomrebels.co.uk/

http://scottishsovereignsontheland.ning.com/

More to come, much more
Nothing on this site constitutes legal advice. This information is for educational purposes only. This site accepts no liability for any events or anything real or imagined for or from anybody or anything alive or dead.
 


Last update:

Published in : , Information
Editor's review User comments Quote this article in website Favoured Print Send to friend Save this to del.icio.us Related articles Read more...
 
Election PDF Print E-mail

So how many untrustworthy scumbags do we still have in Parliament?

Who are the squeeky clean and who are the greedy "let's fill our pockets and get what we can, we have found the gravey train" brigade?

Let us identifiy them now, so we can keep a close eye on their performance and their expenses.

As for CSA/C-MEC We believe that they may be committing fraud on a massive scale, we are investigating some very new information and we do hope to bring you some very interesting information in the coming months.

We do recommend not dealing with them by phone at all, don't even confirm your name to them.

And do not sign any paperwork from them at all.

More Soon.

 

 


Last update:

Published in : , Information
Editor's review User comments Quote this article in website Favoured Print Send to friend Save this to del.icio.us Related articles Read more...
 
Bank Robbery! PDF Print E-mail

Soon you won't be able to trust British Banks at all. The government plan to take money directly from your bank account without even going to court.

Be warned - Get a foreign bank account now

http://www.deadbeatdadsassociation.co.uk/index_files/Page8669.htm

 
David Curry, Stephen Byers, Geoff Hoon and Patricia Hewitt PDF Print E-mail

David Curry stood down as chairman of the Commons standards committee (yes you read that correctly) after The Daily Telegraph disclosed that he had stopped staying at the property on the orders of his wife.
This piece of filth continued claiming £38,000 for the property between July 2005 and March 2009.
His former committee has now ordered him to repay only £28,000 and apologise to the House for his “serious” breach of the rules (crime is now only seen as a breach of the rules if your MP).
Can you believe such muck, he's a fraudster so why is this liar being rewarded to the tune of £10,000 pounds. Why? Shouldn't he also be charged as fraudster? Does this cur have his accounts frozen? loose his licence? go to jail? Does he even go to court? Why not? Is it another case of rules for some and different rules for others! 
How much longer do we have to endure this total and utter corruption?
Stephen Byers, the Westminster scoundral can be bought for 3 to 5 thousand pounds a day!
Can you trust MP tarts who can be bought for cash, to run YOUR country?
As our nation fights on two war front's as our son's have their arms and legs blow off, many blinded for life, the greedy MP'S continue to fill their pockets before the gravy train pulls into the election station.
Gordon doesn't think we need a major enquiry, FUNNY THAT, Most people I talk to think we need a firing squad.
How should they be treated, were they completely within the rules!
Is it just me or would tar and feathers be going to far?
Will you vote this trash back into office?
Will you let this filth sell your policies to the highest bidder?
Are you too lazy or too disgusted to care?
Will you sit home and ignore the next election?
Or will you get out their and ensure this scum are removed from government?

Last update:

Published in : , Information
Editor's review User comments Quote this article in website Favoured Print Send to friend Save this to del.icio.us Related articles Read more...
 
Can you believe these lowlife MP's? PDF Print E-mail

The money grabbing self serving MP's are"quite upset" and have stated that they will not return money which they ought not to have claimed, and intend to "test it before the courts".
Presumably they think it's OK to, what shall we call it "steal" from the tax payer.
Were the CSA victims given any chance to test retrospective claims in the courts when CSA universaly demanded money with menace?
When CSA was introduced many people had court orders for dealing with child support, legaly issued by a judge in a court of law however the new legislation simply crushed and removed all of those court orders in one foul sweep and CSA simply issued new demands for payment which have been vigorously enforced with punitive action being taken against anyone who refused to accept the new retrospective extorsion claims.
Would these same MP's stand side by side with these victims of CSA? I think not, their only interest is in themselves and filling their pockets with the tax payers hard earned cash.
Now we hear that MP's don't think retrospective paybacks are fair and want to challenge this in court. Will these same MP's back a motion for all monies stolen from CSA victims during that retrospective fiasco be returned? Would they support compensation for anyone so punished for refusing to play the CSA retrospective game, again I think not.
We don't care whether these lowlife MP's pay back the money or not we just don't want this type of low life trash running our affairs. They are not fit people to make decisions on our behalf.
Ensure that you DO NOT VOTE FOR ANY THIS BUNCH OF SELF CENTRED MONEY GRABBING SCUM.
GET THEM OUT OF OFFICE. Named and shamed below

Last update:

Published in : , Information
Editor's review User comments Quote this article in website Favoured Print Send to friend Save this to del.icio.us Related articles Read more...
 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 Next > End >>

Results 1 - 10 of 33